“Little children will one day live in a world where their lives are precious and they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character,” is an adaptation of Martin Luther King’s statement by a woman in a global peace workshop.
“What are they thinking?”
“‘We are Jews. For Jews, the people of the world have antisemite laws to allow us freedom to do as we will including the eradication of the Palestinians. We don’t need or like the UN as we are special and above UN rules. What we are not given we will take.’ This sentence describes exactly how the big shots who either live in my Tel Aviv condominium building or use it to occasionally shack up with a mistress, speak to me, and how they apparently think,” explains Simon Baldock, a former IDF officer and current security analyst for a number of nations and corporations.
An analysis article by Micheal John and Behar Abbasi.
Photo of Malala Yousafzai with Kamala Harris, 7 July 2017. Photo credit: The United States Senate – The Office of Kamala Harris – The photo is cropped. Art, cropping, enhancement: Rosa Yamamoto / Feminine-Perspective-Magazine.
The picture and its story: What did these people (Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Dalai Lama, Nelson Mandela, and Malala Yousafzai (Left in the above image.)) all have in common?
Answer from analysts: “Their love and care for you, along with their belief in your human dignity, rights, and personal safety, are what these people all have in common.”
Defining the issues that stand in the way of human development and answering the call for help from Gaia.
“The abuse of antisemitism sentiment and laws has become a stain on world peace. Those laws should now apply widely to all discrimination and hate. In the context of what we know about the universe and some of the celestial objects or planets humans hope to visit someday, none of the human religions make any sense whatsoever. Who in the Andromeda galaxy has ever heard about Mohammed or Jesus? Don’t count on it,” advances Dale Carter, security director for RINJ Women who convened a global digital conference using both video and voice-only participation from women in 12 nations.
Topic: “Violence must become deprecated in all religious documents and decrees. They must all stop slaughtering women and children. The global population is declining at an apocalyptic rate.”
In the next six years, a study estimates, global fertility will drop below replacement level years earlier than others predicted. Citing: Population tipping point could arrive by 2030 | Science | AAAS
“Population growth could grind to a halt by 2050, before decreasing to as little as 6 billion humans on Earth in 2100, a new analysis of birth trends has revealed,” according to a LiveScience study, and many others.
“The lesson learned is that killing off women and children as has been done in Sudan and in Gaza by aggressive men out of self interest, is exacerbating the already plummeting total fertility rate (TFR),” advanced Dr. Kathy Poon, a scientist from CSPAD.org in Singapore.
How do RINJ Women and girls feel about their gender being exterminated in some countries? A RINJ Women HIV testing team returns from a break as they were asked this question. Photo: Melissa Hemingway. Art, cropping, enhancement: Rosa Yamamoto / Feminine-Perspective-Magazine
“Don’t expect women today to enthusiastically approach childbearing when men are slaughtering them over extreme racist claims,” added Dr. Harris from the same team as Dr. Poon in Singapore.
Extreme right wing Cabinet members of Netanyahu in Israel believe Palestinians are descendant of the Amalekites hence Jews are “commanded under book of Deuteronomy” (25:17–19) to kill them all. Art by Rosa Yamamoto / Feminine-Perspective-Magazine
Book of Deuteronomy’s (25:17–19) 2,000-year-old Madness
What is the difference between the “Book of Deuteronomy” and the “Book of Sharia”? None. They are both claims of authority for extreme violent action like a Mafia or Hell’s Angels written declaration of intentions, motives and aberrant views: their Criminal Manifesto.
“Salafi Jihadists as well as Israel’s leaders claim authority for violent action. That authority they claim is derived from their savage ancient history and the radical and exaggerated tales of their ancient religious scribes and tribes. OK fine, let’s go back and live in caves and loin-clothes—if not, then move on to the 21st century where we should be thinking forward. Thus done, we must realize that the world must stop arming irrational abusers, claimants of superiority over others like the Americans, the Israelis and Sudanese lawbreakers,” interjected Mr. Baldock.
Ms. Carter responded quickly saying a mouthful which in the minutes has comprised a substantive part of the summary of the discussion.
“I agree wholeheartedly with Mr. Baldock and Dr. Nassima al Amouri. I too don’t believe it matters what religion people choose for themselves, as long as they do like the Catholics did in 1963 and modernize their thinking out of the dark ages with a process for constant evolution. Clergy and their ‘flock’ must stop imposing their religion upon others and humans must eradicate the ancient proclivity to solving issues with violence. Please stop decreeing that other religions are wrong and modify religious guidelines, whatever they may be called, to a 21st century adherence to caring and sharing across mankind, without violence. We can agree to disagree on anything to do with God but what we need to agree upon is human goals, human values and human behaviour,” Ms. Carter adduced causing the group to become silent while scribing notes furiously.
Mr. Baldock and other participants in the digital conference round table also agreed to the content of this conversation exchange. Each participant region had begun with a 4 minute dissertation and following each one was a discussion and then finally a general discussion and presentation from the RINJ Women security contractor which included suggestions for legal and extra-legal action with respect to the American/Israeli attack and murder of RINJ Women and their patients.
Behar Abbasi interjected to say that, “we could take a page from ancient Asian law and some newcomers, and listen to what the leadership ‘elders’ like Martin Luther King, have said. Maybe everything we need to know has been told to us in words and deeds, even at great sacrifice.”
“I have a dream that little children will one day live in a world where their lives are precious and they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character,” is an adaptation of Martin Luther King’s words aimed at the whole world but Gaza in particular where tens of thousands of women and children have been murdered by the despicable Netanyahu government of Israel which has destroyed Israel and Palestine.
- Mahatma Gandhi: Known for his philosophy of nonviolent resistance, or Satyagraha, Gandhi led India to independence from British rule through peaceful protests and civil disobedience.
- Martin Luther King Jr.: A key figure in the American civil rights movement, King advocated for racial equality through nonviolent means. His famous “I Have a Dream” speech and peaceful protests were instrumental in advancing somewhat the civil rights in the United States.
- Dalai Lama: The spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, the Dalai Lama has long promoted peace, compassion, and nonviolence. He received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 for his efforts to peacefully resolve the Tibetan conflict with China.
- Nelson Mandela: Although initially involved in armed resistance, Mandela later became a symbol of reconciliation and peace in South Africa, leading the country through a peaceful transition from apartheid to democracy. Today South Africa has become a voice for fairness and non-violent solutions to even complex issues.
- Malala Yousafzai: As a young advocate for girls’ education and the youngest-ever Nobel Prize laureate, Malala has become a global symbol of peaceful activism.
“Malala Yousafzai is a Shero featured in the lead photo, (born 12 July 1997, Mingora, Swat valley, Pakistan) is a Pakistani activist who, while a teenager, spoke out publicly against the prohibition on the education of girls that was imposed by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP; sometimes called Pakistani Taliban). She gained global attention when she survived an assassination attempt at age 15. In 2014 Yousafzai and Kailash Satyarthi were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace in recognition of their efforts on behalf of children’s rights.” Citing Britannica.
“Moving beyond religion-based and race-based hatred is essential for creating a better world,” said a friend, quietly.
Martin Luther King Jr. is a remarkable figure in the history of peace and civil rights. His commitment to nonviolence and equality has left an indelible mark on the world. King’s leadership in the American civil rights movement, particularly through peaceful protests and his powerful speeches, helped to bring about significant social change. Can we find someone to move that forward in the 21st Century? Have they been born yet? Have we already stood by and without knowing, watched as that child was killed in Gaza.
One of his most famous moments was the “I Have a Dream” speech, delivered during the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. In this speech, he eloquently shared his vision of a future where people would be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
King’s efforts were instrumental in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which were crucial in dismantling institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination in the United States.
The conference concluded that “the current rogue and presumably fascist variant of the EU as well as the current U.S. President Biden and the 47th U.S. President must stop supplying weapons and munitions to Israel and to Palestine. If they don’t stop, they must be sanctioned by the world via the United Nations’ General Assembly and boycotted by the world until amends are made properly.”
“The people of the Biden administration, including Biden must be indicted and convicted of genocide under the 18 USC 1091: Genocide Law. Since when do some people above others have total impunity?” advanced Monique DesLauriers, executive director of The RINJ Foundation in the USA.
§1091. Genocide
(a) Basic Offense.-Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such-(1) kills members of that group;(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b) Punishment for Basic Offense.-The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is-
(1) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and
(2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.
(c) Incitement Offense.-Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(d) Attempt and Conspiracy.-Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.
(e) Jurisdiction.-There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if-
(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2) regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is-
(A) a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(C) a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or
(D) present in the United States.